![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/664a1de6-cb61-4a9f-96b4-9db4e4c7d26d.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/913b482d-9012-449f-bc87-b1f4463e7154.jpeg)
I feel like I’ve heard that clearing the tangles really doesn’t affect the trajectory of the disease?
I feel like I’ve heard that clearing the tangles really doesn’t affect the trajectory of the disease?
You must be new here
I hear this often, and I fail to understand why anyone would need to defend male circumcision in the first place. Why must we continue to perform male circumcision and ban female circumcision? Couldn’t both just be banned?
I agree it was stupid. I just know that media companies are foaming at the mouth to use this decision to destroy online lending all together. And many writers are being tricked into thinking this will somehow help them. It won’t. This will help Amazon. People renting your book from the internet archive is not why you’re failing to make money.
I hope all the writers who support this lawsuit understand that they are contributing to a long standing effort to outlaw libraries in general. Nobody makes direct money off of sharing things. Get ready for DRM involved in every single thing that you do.
You guys don’t know what you’re missing.
Ecofacist talking points.
Edit: I’m literally right Referring to humanity as a “virus” is textbook ecofacism. If you’re offended by this, do some reading.