Maybe a 10 if they also regularly do all that at sex parties and masturbate in the bathroom at work
Maybe a 10 if they also regularly do all that at sex parties and masturbate in the bathroom at work
My point is the cops were not on a crusade against baby formula purchasers like the headline implies.
So they were just denying everyone entry to the grocery store and this really has nothing to do with baby formula?
Well I guess we can’t go to universities in the eastern half of the US. And not in the middle either (tornadoes), and not in the west either (wildfires). Should we all move to Wyoming? This Lemming seems to know what’s best for us 340 million Americans. Surely we can all fit in Wyoming. It’ll be a glorious utopia!
How do you even get a pokeball that big?
Disconnect Peripheral: Removes someone’s limb.
Critical Vulnerability: Increases critical hit rate.
Memory buffer: Allows you yo remember things better.
This is a good thing
My problem with all of these is they end up being top-heavy and uncomfortable to hold
It’s still in the “concept of a plan” phase
I love going into a PR with 3 approvals already and shitting all over it
Hm. I’ll make sure not to enable that setting
I thought only the Republicans projected
Good news! You van get covid more than once, so these tests can still come in handy!
And old tests may not detect new strains
That doesn’t sound overhyped. Sounds like it is effective
I feel like it’s hyped just enough. It does have the potential to revolutionize computing but we have no practical applications for it at the current point in its development. There’s only so much you can hype something that can’t even act as a simple calculator better than a handheld calculator can.
Your analogy is get accurate. It’s more like: commercial fisherman murders hundreds of innocent fish. Those fish usually go toward feeding whales. Why do the fishermen hate whales?
The real crime here is too many people, these cops included, use “just following orders” as justification to hand-wave away the side effects as not their problem. The intent is important here, and the headline for this article misconstrues the intent and cause of the resulting suffering. For that matter, it doesn’t even go into detail about the actual suffering, just a hypothetical one.
What am I saying? This isn’t even an article. Why are we treating a post on X as any source of information?