The Liberals wanted Poilievre legally silenced because his arguments were winning against the Liberal talking points. So if he is now forced to stay silent then that allows the Liberals to lie to the people, lie to the public, and Poilievre can’t explain why what they are saying is false. But with him not getting security clearance he can point out falasies in their statements and argue against their logic and there is no legal danger for anything he says because he has not seen anything.

If Poilievre sees some secret information and fires a member of his own Conservative party that is mentioned in the information, Poilievre violated the security act and legally he’s out. Without that security clearance he has full reign as leader without confines or legal restrictions.

That is self-aggrandizement.

He rejected the security clearance because if he mentions anything they show him he can be charged criminally on national scecurity grounds, even as a sitting member of parliment he can be charged and his seat would be in jeopardy if he talks.

The Liberals push for him to get a security clearance was all a tactic to force him into silence under threat of arrest if he mentions what he reads or sees.

Poilievre cannot be defeated if you attack him from the left. Everything from legacy media is to the left. Poilievre very much can be defeated if you hit him from the right.

I guess I spelled it wring. I was talking abiut Massie, not Massey, about commenta on hanging people, or what you called lynching.

Can you share Massey’s comments or statement on it to read or watch for mysef?

Mentioning lynching is emotional manipulation. Falsely claiming that lynching is not a federal crime, you’re saying that commiing homicide by hanging is not a federal crime, but commiting homicide by shooting is a federal crime.

Proof that she is a con and is lying to the country is she won’t do interviews with anyone who will point out her 5 years of contradictions and ask her ti explain. She will only do interviews with people who recieved government subsidy.

If she really is against elites, ask if people have a protected right to protest in front of parliment against the federal government.

I do believe there are authentic, genuine politicans, but I’me I’m inclined to bellieve that politicians are worse than people believe. Politicians on the left are worse than people think, politicians on the right are worse than people think.

I believe that you are American, the ones I do trust at face value for moral consistency is Thomas Massey, Mike Lee, Chip Roy, and Louie Gohmert. Don’t mistaken trust for full total agreement. It means their public statements is how they are alone in private.

Why is there no piblic access to the communication records of politicians and members of government?

Users can have upvotes and downvotes disabled in settings so they are never see how many vote up or down.