osaerisxero

the people who switch to Firefox for ad-blockers and ad-free YouTube aren’t the kinds of people who are donating much to Mozilla

I went to donate to Mozilla when I switched back to it from chrome early last year. It said on their website by the donate link, which was very difficult to find, that the proceeds from those donations did not go towards firefox but towards their other projects.

I don’t know if that’s the case today, but there was no way to contribute to firefox directly when I sought it out, or at least not in a way I could find. Maybe it was a stipulation of the Googlegeld, idk.

They really should be copying the success of the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikipedia

Step 1: Be hilariously wealthy from prior investments and businesses Step 2: Do a thing nobody has ever done before at a time when interest rates mean money is free Step 3: Blind luck

I’m not sure how they’re supposed to reproduce those at this point.

Plot twist: both fleets consist exclusively of time travel clones of Voyager

He was specifically instructed in the linked pr to change the license terms, I don’t see how that makes him the asshole here.

This seems exactly right to me. More of a “we wanted to win, not burn down the board”. Take the W and hope it can convince some holdovers from that era to stay home, if not vote the same way.

Fixing the sign would cut into the executives’ yacht fund

That was in no way clear

Good day for the Satisfactory 1.0 release then

Remarkable, isn’t it

I will be incredibly disappointed if it’s not a completely obvious backdoor pilot to either movies or another series.

Maybe they can seize it as part of the investigation into the larger Russian influence campaigns

To be fair, there was an honest gambit there with Our Pal Russia, the same one that was tried with China. It didn’t work but it seemed like a fair thing to try, especially considering the economic constraints of the alternative.

This is basically correct, though it also does other stuff.

EDIT: Location services is in its own process tho

Not invisible, transparent. As in you can see all the insides from the outside.

I think there’s scope here for the FBI to be doing more than one thing.

How are they not in prison awaiting trial yet

I didn’t see anything in the ruling that would restrict it in that way, but i would be happy to be wrong there.

It’s not useless, it’s saying you can’t afford the better quality product you dirty, dirty poor.

Do not recommend on videos doesn’t work in my experience, you have to do not recommend channel and then be consistent about not clicking on it when other similar content comes up

It’s telegram’s crimes, specifically withholding evidence from authorities, that are preventing said criminals from being held liable, or so the theory goes.

Which is what will happen if you maintain a well curated feed. But most people don’t apply ‘dont recommend channel’ at the first sign of bullshit, so their feeds get filled with it in the fullness of time.