Except Ukrainians, Taiwanese and others may pay a hefty price for this one.
I try to contribute to things getting better, sometimes through polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with your comment ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to refine the arguments that make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.
Except Ukrainians, Taiwanese and others may pay a hefty price for this one.
I feel like the thought that Twitter was ever a mass social platform for everyone is very journalist bias view. Facebook, Instagram and Reddit were already massive players before the Xtermination.
People who love or tolerate left populism.
Isn’t it supposed to be love rather than just friendship?
Imagine he tries and fails, like the last who tried.
There are a lot of people and organizations that are just slow to move and don’t really know where to go.
Don’t get them, even if she goes down, the number 2 of this party is much younger so he wasn’t involved in this and he could take her place easily. In my opinion he’s more dangerous, he doesn’t have the stain of the Le Pen name, he’s 29 and he has avoided stupid political mistakes/crimes so far as far as I know. He’s part of the party’s new “impeccable” generation created by Marine Le Pen learning from her father’s mistakes (such as being openly racist in the media).
You have to pick the right petting options to unlock the boon.
You have to bury your face in the fur to restore stamina.
Probably the two IT nerds who manage the Vatican systems.
I’m worried a failing economy could actually motivate them to get into war to divert the people’s attention and stay in power, I think it’s a common political tactic.
Does it also pull support for old Linux distributions?
To justify the investment, it would need to become mainstream.
Why do you think another populism is the solution?
It’s also true in many tertiary jobs too, communication of what you made matters at least as much as what you made.
When you are not an expert of the domain, it is easy to get mislead by arguments such as the one you gave, maybe you’re correct, maybe you’re misleading, I don’t have the knowledge to verify by myself. That’s why I need to rely on reputable source, and it’s hard to do more reputable than a meta-analysis in Science. If you are correct, the rebuttal will eventually be published in a peer reviewed journal, I’ll will be happy to read the conclusions then.
I am skeptical that researchers and reviewers of Science wouldn’t have accounted for that. I made some research about rebuttal to this study, so far the only ones I have found are from farmer related or anti-vegan communities, which are likely more biased than a scientific journal. I will need at least a contradictory peer reviewed article to convince me this meta analysis is incorrect.
I don’t have the current knowledge nor the time to reach the level of researchers in the domain to make my own meta analysis. Where can I read a reputable rebuttal to this meta analysis?
What does he gain from Senate voting against him?