I meant the milk, but ok. farmers agree: calves are the farmers property as much as the cows are

babies don’t make milk. other animals don’t have property. You’re just anthropomorphizing.

just saying it doesn’t make it so. it’s perfectly natural to drink milk, and plenty of people aren’t lactose intolerant.

many naturally aren’t.

no, they didnt

It’s YOUR fault no matter how you twist reality.

the only people to blame for Trump’s presidency are the people that voted for him and funded him. like Hilary Clinton.

what did contrapoints do?

obama ran on the famous deportation mantra si se puedes, and ran out of bombs killing brown people. just because you’re concerned about one facet, doesn’t make it less fascist

absurd ideological basis (anarchy supporters)

I am not a community but can you please add me to your list

They allowed racist, misogynistic fascism to take firm root, good luck weeding it out now.

was that in the progressive era, when eugenics and fascism were the rage? the usa is fascist, and has been for all of living memory. blue-colored or red-colored isn’t less fascism.

they follow their own processes, use their own research, and come to their own conclusions based on what they consider to be the best available evidence.

some of that evidence was a paper which has since expired. if those organizations aren’t updating their positions at least as frequently as the AND is, then we cannot believe that their positions are any more valid than the expired AND paper that they relied on

the expired paper doesn’t matter. It has no relevance

it’s the exact paper linked in the initial comment to which I replied.

And the page about childhood nutrition:

I wasn’t reading carefully. I missed this. it doesn’t change whether the other paper expired, is the current position of the academy, or whether papers that relied on it should be considered reliable unless they update.

it’s written on the paper itself: it expired in december of 2021, and is no longer the position of teh academy.

You really need to take a look in the mirror and ask yourself why you’re trying so hard to lie about this.

Especially in the context of every other health authority around the world affirming that a properly implemented plant-based diet is safe and adequate for all stages of life.

every such position i’ve seen relies on the now-expired AND position. they should not be considered valid unless they have also been updated and no longer rely on an expired position.

You cannot draw that conclusion from that one article

the previous position expired. that is no longer the position of the academy. you can see all the current positions of the academy at https://www.jandonline.org/content/positionPapers

they let that position expire, and when they issued a new position, it specifically excluded them. the expired position is not their current position.

their previous position was that a vegan diet could be healthy for children or pregnant or lactating people. that is no longer their position.

you’re the one who can’t seem to count.