You are absolutely right. It was inline comments I had in mind.
You are absolutely right. It was inline comments I had in mind.
Absolutely, although I see that as part of why
Why is there a horrible hack here? Because stupid reason…
No, but it’s getting more and more so here (Sweden) too with the ongoing polarization.
Comments should explain “why”, the code already explains “what”.
It depends on if it requires server side connection or not.
Texts are not synchronous communication. If a response/action is needed, a voice call is better suited.
I try to follow Bash strict mode. It can protect you from some foot shooting.
People tend to like what they are used to.
I understand that you jest, but risk is not only about odds. When you calculate risk you also want to consider the severity of failure not only likelihood. If you risk shitting out your liver you want better odds than if you just risk feeling a bit I’ll for a bit.
We have historically used GitPython a lot, but in a recent project I tried git via sh instead. It works great. If you already know the git cli, this feels very ergonomic to use.
From a European, what does a standard NA beer bottle look like? I thought your bottles were similar to ours, which means bottom heavy and a slim neck.
No thanks
Anatsa uses advanced techniques to avoid >detection and gain access to banking >information.
Anyone who knows what those advanced techniques are?
There is probably licensed code in there somewhere. Which means open sourcing it is really cumbersome. It would probably cost more money to open source it than to do the refund.
It’s so weird that Google migrated to the pile of dung that is RCS instead of just fostering any of their existing chat protocols. Google Talk was working great 15 years ago…
You are right, I didn’t think of MBR.
It was possible for Ubuntu once upon a time
If you know how the code does something, you also know what it does.