Missed it at first until I read your comment.

He must’ve spent a fhew grand

Come minister Paulina, tally me banana. Banana come, and me run away.

|\/|

It’s lit, man.

I put my alarm as birds chirping for a while. The problem was that I couldn’t sleep in any longer on weekends, because the birds chirping outside would wake me up.

I guess no one said shower thoughts had to be accurate.

Your head must be banging today.

https://xkcd.com/1053/

Right meow?

Perhaps, but think of it this way: you likely have money invested or money that is invested on your behalf, whether that’s personal, 401k, IRA, or government pension. Those are likely investments spread across many companies - so should your carbon footprint take into account what those companies are doing?

I’d suggest that companies should be responsible for their carbon footprint, and legislated accordingly. Pushing it to investors, or on their customers, just seems like passing the buck.

Including investments seems a bit disingenuous. I’m sure their personal carbon footprint is already huge without having to include that.

Based on that picture alone, there are 24 pods. So 24 x $700 = $168k per mo or over $2m a year.

Edit: oops! Tried to math too late at night.

24 x $700 = $16.8k per mo or over $200k per year

It really ties the room together.

Jesus…!

I’m only a racist when I’m sleepy.

Woop-woop-woopwooopwoop-wooop

How am I funny? Like a clown?

A lot of countries in South America had very strict rules. Double-mask requirements, mandatory vaccines, stay-at-home days. What they perhaps lacked in access to vaccines, they tried to make up with those stricter rules. They also made deals with China & Russia for their vaccines, in lieu of limited access to Pfizer etc.

Sports jerseys are even worse. You pay a fortune, to wear plastic, and then you have 3-4 sponsors plastered all over the shirt.