Actually, it can be there, but then you won’t know how fast it’s moving.
He/him
Hot high speed rail lines near you.
PM me ur sexy train pics.
Actually, it can be there, but then you won’t know how fast it’s moving.
I imagine any reasonable traffic law would forbid drivers from impeding traffic like that. You might be able to do it somewhat discreetly, but it’s still a matter of enforcement, and you can bet blue nonces will suddenly start caring about enforcing traffic laws.
Edit: UK Road Traffic Act
If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence.
At first this caption made me think that Kenyan giraffes are especially gay, as if Kenya was some kind of Washington D.C. of giraffe world. In other news, I am now aware of grey whale orgies.
Jellyfin and sin
It really feels like SCOTUS noticed that environmentally-conscious people are advocating for expansion of rail, and will now rule in favour of this project just to spite them.
approval for a railroad project
Let’s see…
that would carry crude oil
😭 what the heck
Fidesz is nonaligned as well, judging by the polls it’ll be about 9 or 10 seats for them.
Until now I was under the impression that this was the goal of these notices:
If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Because if an LLM ingests a comment with a copyright notice like that, there’s a chance it will start appending copyright notices to it’s own responses, which could technically, legally, maybe make the AI model CC BY-NC-SA 4.0? A way to “poison” the dataset, so that OpenAI is obliged to distribute it’s model under that license. Obviously there’s no chance of that working, but it draws attention to AI companies breaking copyright law.
(also, I have no clue about copyrights)
Thanks for the context. I still don’t really trust the efforts to decarbonize oil, and I’d rather see it downsized or replaced (with e-fuels for example), than building new plants that are more efficient. Except we’re so reliant on oil we can’t just use less of it, so the options are limited.
What exactly is the rationale behind sending essentially a carbon tax paid by German citizens to the opposite end of the world? Other than potential for oversights and fraud, obviously. Instead of funding renewables in Germany, the money is used to “reduce CO2 emissions” during fossil fuel extraction, what the fuck?
Nice argument, unfortunately I don’t care about laws of physics
So if it turned out Saudi Arabia and UAE were using slave labor during oil extraction, we’d ban oil imports from there, right?
like this?
Looks like Delta will be one of the first, but I don’t think it’s available just yet.
I think “Nintendo” should be treated like a plural noun because they consist of many lawyers.
Unfortunately you’re completely wrong here. Americans, burgers, and fractions don’t mix well.
Third pound burger failed because people thought it was smaller than a Quarter Pounder
Nice try kiddo, but sloth is a sin 😎
A blank template for your duneposting needs (I pulled it from a trailer so the frames don’t quite match, but image quality is better)
The only story that pops up is a pipeline rupture in Satartia, Mississippi. No fatalities, 46 people hospitalized.
Maybe OP is misremembering?https://apnews.com/general-news-24e50c057a8102b18247f1fad7837605 https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/26/22642806/co2-pipeline-explosion-satartia-mississippi-carbon-capture
Edit: They probably mean this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Nyos_disaster