You can’t charge them for war crimes bc war crime isn’t a US law. This didn’t exist before and the official unofficial distinction was explicitly created in the ruling. The above post outlines exactly the process now established to block any case, suggesting that because a more ridiculously comically corrupt version of a ruling exist that this isn’t it nonsense and clearly demonstrative of your goal to spin propaganda.

Your post is a lie, self contradictory and explicit propaganda. Your account should be blocked and banned.

That’s true other than it’s absolutely not.

Look at the lib escalate into a spiraling web of complexity in order to justify failure. No, the timeline here was unreasonable and will allow trump to win again. The Dems have served up a silver platter to the wealthy.

I mean the reasons exist but if the system cannot rapidly respond to attempts to destroy it then those attempts will succeed.

That the charges weren’t made until late last year is also a failure, the whole process has been unreasonable long.

The system doesn’t want to save it’s self, we are on a clear path towards fascism.

High super consumption has much more impact on heart health than fats as well.

For what it’s worth that person was on a motorcycle

Pork fat is less processed product and certainly more healthy. America isn’t actually great at much but one thing we do have is the least healthy food to ever exist.

Yes, the supreme Court gave itself that power. To that end the other branches could justifiably choose to not find that to be valid.

By Jan 2025 the only outcomes are Trump has won without conflict or the election is a contested mess and congress is deadlocked on certification and they will have moved to the vote by state in the house. In which case trump will be elected.

The Constitution doesn’t empower the court to interpret the constitution. If the executive chose to ignore the court it would be perfectly legal.

I actually ment corporate ha

It’s highlighting a potential significant risk. Major ozone loss is much worse than lack of internet. The high uncertainty of the paper is easily offset by the harm that would be caused if the paper is correct.

Doing scientific experiments to understand the risks is worth doing.

Just a cooperate lawyer, so yes.

Whats funny is the poster here was very likely part of said disinformation campaign. This is an attempt to distract from the moral wrong excuted here with the cover of legality. No laws existed that made the Holocaust illegal yet the post laws and trails are valid and necessary. The acts here should be seen as a form of biological warfare, a crime against humanity with all the reprehensible disgust and reasonable punishment due to those who did not stand up and walk away.

Following orders is not just how it works and the criminality of following illegal orders has been established many times.

This is a crime, regardless of the laws today, regardless of my feelings, it is never acceptable to attempt to infect others with a deadly biological agent directly or indirectly.

That is the McKinsey formula, abuse consumer trust to have them over pay expecting the previous quality of goods while you slowly slash all your costs and bottom out the quality of your product. The lag time between your actions to destroy the product and the consumer realizing that your doing is all profit.

It seems worth worrying about if only to try and make valve think about the future.

False