
Exactly. We need to fix the entrenchment, and we can fix this stupid two party system.
Exactly. We need to fix the entrenchment, and we can fix this stupid two party system.
Bernie created capitalism, he can destroy it. He chooses not to!
I’ve only ever seen a few episodes but I don’t know how accurate this is at all.
My view is that if we can’t have the things we want without ads, then we need a new business model. I’m not super into the whole kindness and donations model. If we need it to be state funded, so be it.
Why would anyone use a desktop? That’s like a baby’s toy!
Only for the parts that don’t help rich people.
Talking about China’s human rights issues right away is very strange. Nobody does this if someone mentions a US project.
I guess we’ll have to make our own memes that are similar but convey the proper message about capitalism and institutional responsibility.
I would say both. Multifaceted approach. If there’s a legitimate use case for private jets, maybe they could be allowed once we’ve transitioned to clean energy.
I just don’t agree with you about that. I don’t think yours is a ridiculous read on it, I just don’t perceive that myself. I think the part you are mentioning is what you’re inferring, not what it’s implying or stating.
You should look into it. Apparently it was quite a performance increase. I don’t understand all the technical details, but it is very cool to see what large enterprises do at scale.
There is absolutely no way that’s true lol
So why did Facebook build that whole system of converting C++ to PHP or whatever they did? Was it because they didn’t understand the savings? Or when you scale that high, the savings really are significant? Were there savings?
Edit to subtract: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HHVM is what it eventually turned into, and apparently it showed significant improvements even above the previous system.
Yep, I was just agreeing with someone else saying this is unenforceable. Just a ridiculous ploy and an attempt to make it precedent.
I honestly think it’s just a ridiculous ploy and that the product is fine. We need a proper regulatory system instead of this junk. I do think it’s unenforceable though.
I love this comment! But we should definitely be fighting hard against the mass criminalization of shoplifting. They’ll send pigs out for a $5 lipstick.
Now I understand the bastardization of the term “raw dog” to describe staring at nothing.
I can’t stand this faux leftist bullshit. There’s a reason why I call this right wing nonsense: it impedes the improvement of people’s material lives. We don’t have to like the Democrats in order to reject this absolute nonsense.