![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/70c5fe07-4a33-494a-b67b-164287421a94.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
“What do humans eat? sandwiches, ive heard of that”
“Oh yes i enjoy regular sandwiches just like all other regular humans. A big enjoyer of sandwiches. Yes. Uh fillings? What? No, I look after my teeth”
“What do humans eat? sandwiches, ive heard of that”
“Oh yes i enjoy regular sandwiches just like all other regular humans. A big enjoyer of sandwiches. Yes. Uh fillings? What? No, I look after my teeth”
And now these horribly abused children are adults with their own children.
Thankfully a lot of them are learning to break the cycle of parental mental abuse
this poster is back again? no one finds you funny.
which exploit a loophole on low valued goods
In the article.
In the EU, the threshold for the levy is €150 (£127) and in the UK it is £135
In the UK, items valued at £39 or less also do not attract import VAT.
Last year, 2.3bn items below the duty-free €150 threshold were imported into the EU
The ones I am talking about don’t move under their own weight and gravity. If you held it with the cap upwards, it doesn’t rotate downwards unless you do it yourself
hence why getting hit in the face and struggling with a little cap is so puzzling to me
less knife friendly
Most places are advanced enough to not require their citizens to carry weaponry.
needing to always be armed is a uniquely american problem
Does america have terrible bottle designs or something? Not one single bottle with tethered cap has ever freely spun, you can move it and it stays in that position
what i think when people struggle with the cap hitting their face
Reading through this entire comment chain was interesting, because it seems everyone has missed each others points
FlyingSquid I believe means like, parents having a photo album (ie, a literal traditional physical one my mum had of me) which contains like “photo of first bath” or “photo of new t shirt but no bottoms cause running around as toddlers do”, completely innocent shit mixed in with general baby photos. And pulling that album out is used to embarrass the adult son/daughter with funny baby pictures and “haha look at baby you naked”, completely innocent humour. It might be less common these days, generationally people don’t do it as much.
nomus(?), killingtime(?) etc etc the others replying seem to be taking the comic literally as if the photos are solely of genitalia and thats the frame/centre point of the image instead of it just a kid doing something normal and happens to be nude.
I am sure flyingsquid isn’t going around with photos of their kids privates to show to people / send it to people etc with the specific intention of showing private areas but instead like my previous example, the kid is in the bath. Or running around without bottoms or a nappy cause it was changing time. Who knows. But its a far cry from the extreme end which everyone else seems to be assuming
Removed by mod
Publish was 2021 so yeah a couple years old
The entire gimmick of a joke leading into the sponsor. The literal phrasing “… like this segue to our sponsor”
Could be liability? Someone sells a poorly made toy which breaks inside someone. Is etsy concerned they maybe held liable for that sort of thing being allowed to be sold? I don’t know - thinking out loud
I believe its a byproduct of originally being filmed in front of a studio
Within the first minute just entirely rips off LTT.
I gave up when this “task based file” workflow thing came up.
create a “file” add some text. (notepad). Want to add an image? You can! Now its a formatted document (word, writer etc). Want to present it? You press present and now its … a presentation? (powerpoint etc)
How the hell could this ever work? All of these apps (under the hood) would need to handle all these wildly different file formats whenever you suddenly want to change what you’re doing. It would require the OS to basically pass everything around instead, and all apps to be able to understand any potential file format that could ever exist, in case the “incoming” file change (notepad to word, txt to docx) is wildly different.
And what about files that have entirely unrelated tasks? I have a video saved through the “task based workflow above” which my final output is a playing video (so in vlc under the hood). But I don’t want to watch it, I want to edit it.
Am I now going to open the file and choose an app, or open an app and choose a file? How do I tell the computer what “task” I want, without telling it both the file and the app.
In this task based workflow it seems to imply there can only ever be one app under the hood. What if I present internally on teams and externally on zoom?
What if I want to edit a video and watch a different video? Or edit the video in one of many different editors, all of which “edit video” but do it different ways and have different uses?
A task based workflow as described would still need to start from either a file or an app. Its all well and good having a “new file” button which then magically takes me to whatever thing I need to modify that file, but as soon as more than one app exists to do similar tasks, this flow entirely breaks unless you start to add a list of tasks with slightly different names. And youre back to the original problem statement.
why do you think learning about your brain cause it to become more complex?
I prefer to boot a live USB first to get a better feel
100GB for a game? Rookie numbers by today’s standards. Removing that still wouldn’t be enough for modern “AAA” games
What’s the timeline for when a fictional love story about 911 is acceptable?
there is help, if you reach out to local support services