Sad, I’d like to know a bit more since we have a Hungarian neighbor, Ive never gotten the opportunity to learn more.

And that’s about everything I know in Hungarian :)

Magyar?

You just found the centurion

Given OPs history, yes it does.

There is a difference between what the powers that be allow and what we personally think is okay.

And the person I replied to apparently thinks genocide is okay as long as it hits the right people.

You see, genocide is bad unless it hits the right people.

Typical anarchkiddie. You just don’t get, the Makhnovshchina was of course allied with the whites and full of fascist counter-revolutionaries. That’s we had go back on our promise to send them weapons and that’s why we had to stab them in the back when the whites attacked.

Not RT repeating the same horseshit as Breitbart, The Jerusalem Post and Fox News lol.

The most effective way of population control is education, curbing of religious influences and raising of living standards. Just look up “demographic change”. In the 1880, German fertility rates were between 5.5 and 5. That’s on par with modern day Niger and Mali, some of the most fertile nations in the world. As soon as the mortality rates of German children dropped and a social net was established, rates fell. And this has happened all over the world. Unless we get taken in by abrahamic fertility cults again, a healthier, better educated and equal society will stabilize the world’s population at around 9 billion. And we can easily support them, if we work towards it. No need for pseudoeugenics or other population control mechanisms.

“Mitläufer”. A German Term for people who don’t revel in their role, don’t actively contribute to the suffering, but just “let it run its course”.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/executions-began-when-war-ended-iran

I think, this is a better take on the situation than whatever cfr wrote.

In this thread alone there are two people calling all immigration bad.

Oh Peterson is extremely annoying. His preferred style of discussion is essentially an upgraded version of the Shapiro method:

1. Throw out an argument
2. When this argument is attacked, immediately derail the discussion to talk about definitions
3. Whenever it seems like your opponent tries to define something by using a different word, interrupt them by questioning the definition of that word.

It’s the idea of platonic ideals but perverted, so that you cannot ever describe things, because to describe you have to use other things to compare them to. Critically, he never uses this argument against himself. His definitions, however circular they are, are unassailable and end up so distorted that he essentially creates his own language.

Take the word “believe”. To Peterson, this is defined as “willing to give up your life before renouncing a thing”. Who TF uses this word that way?

There wouldn’t be a dick joke. You’d be a disgusting monster, preying on children and murdering people, and you’d be portrayed as the ugliest and fattest human ever. Wearing a beret and eating baguette, to subtly hint at your frenchiness. Because J.D. Rowingboat hates trans people so much, she’s willing to enter alliances with self proclaimed fascists.

sustainable Romans

Lol.

This guy has no fucking clue about human beings and does not give a single shit about human beings. His opinion can be safely discarded

Yeah, the right therapist can be a game change.

For me, actually having the words to express something and thinking more about why I avoid a situation helped me a lot.

Where can one acquire an anti air missile?

The average human wants to kill millions of kids?