AwesomeLowlander
- 1 Post
- 221 Comments
1·4 hours agoDude seriously. You’re a mod, act like it.
It still makes me tear up every time I skim it, yeah.
4·1 day agoIt’s never been on sale, but the price HAS gone up multiple times since it was first launched in alpha.
There isn’t even any risk, considering the amount of detail they’ve covered in the dev blogs.
12·1 day agoThey can, but it costs so much that salvaging it is cheaper
Does this ruby actually exist? There seem to be almost no references to it online. A Rolling Stones article, OP’s link, and a couple of reddit posts. It does not appear on Wikipedia’s list of world’s largest rubies. As recently as last year, this would have placed #1 on world’s largest rubies sold.
Something smells fishy here.
There’s a reason the article won a Pulitzer. Maybe you could give it a try
So many possible factors. Family support allowing more sleep, less car-centric cities, less tradition of single parent transporting the kid around while on errands, etc etc.
None of these people were idiots.
Check out this article: Fatal Distraction, it won a Pulitzer Prize. It’s about how the mind works and why this incident keeps happening over and over again.
Nobody INTENDS to leave their kid in the car to die.
Fatal Distraction is a Pulitzer Prize winning article that examines how the mind works and why this sort of incident keeps happening over and over again.
They are. The people who do this? They are you and me and your neighbor.
Check out this article: Fatal Distraction, it won a Pulitzer Prize. It’s about how the mind works and why this incident keeps happening over and over again.
I see it’s time to repost this:
Fatal distraction, a Pulitzer Prize winning article
Tearjerker article about how parents who’ve been through this felt, why it happens, and what car manufacturers could do to prevent it.
Didn’t he just declare a day ago that the UK wouldn’t rejoin the EU?
The Disney family no longer owns or controls Disney Megacorp, AFAIK. It’s an independent company run in the usual way now.
No, it does not. I have not read anything about Gaiman’s case, and have absolutely no opinion on it at this point. My comment was entirely a commentary on the absurdity of your logic.
Troll? I was pointing out the issues in your logic. Was the blatant sarcasm not blatant enough for you?
I’m all for supporting women. Give them a chance to speak out, make sure they are fairly listened to and taken seriously. You’ve gone a step beyond that, you’ve already decided guilt and innocence and proclaimed it. More, you’re doing so from a position of influence (yes, as a moderator of a large community, that’s what you are). This is the sort of thing that libel charges get filed for (ok, not gonna happen at our current size, but you may want to start keeping that in mind.)
Why would you default to that?
Because that’s the basis of our legal bloody system! Innocent until proven guilty! There’s a thousand law professors out there who can explain it better and more eloquently than I could in a thousand years, but that’s the gist of it.
You do not need a conviction to make up your mind.
That’s correct. We do, however, need a conviction before stating it as fact instead of opinion.
Not only are you siding with the party with no evidence
I beg to differ. I have not sided with any party. What is it about people today that they seem unable to grasp the concept of neutrality?
Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.
[email protected]