Sandy Loam??? WHO IS SHE
Xavienth
- 0 Posts
- 94 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
Cake day: July 18th, 2020
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Quebec swear words are almost all Catholicism-derived. The Tabernacle, the Host, the Chalice, the Virgin, etc.
The problem with UBI is it won’t come without the power of the people forcing it. And then when that dies down it can just as easily be taken away. If you’ve got a mass movement with that power, why would stop at a bandaid?
Of course, that would never change in the face of changing financial incentives. The world as it is is the world as it ought to be.
I had one professor who could tell almost any calculator model from 30 feet away. Other than him I never had any professor care about the specific model of calculator during an examination.
It’s not so much the force that is important, regardless of if it’s normalized for body size, it’s the pressure that does damage. psi (or Pa in SI) is the appropriate unit.
It is the quadratic formula. It already is the solution. The problem is any quadratic of the form ax²+bx+c=0
Have people never heard of the quiet game outside of an Australian cartoon?
1·1 month agoI’m not clear on the details but I think some servers just hook up open loop to mains water for cooling.
Which would conversely strengthen the idea that wolves hunt in packs due to the difficulty of hunting.
But wait, if a lone wolf gets 53% of the moose, but a pack of six gets 83% of the moose, then per-wolf that’s 13.8% of the moose. Why would an individual opt to hunt in a pack then?
The global birth rate is falling. It’s still quite above the replacement rate, but it is not as high as it used to be; it has fallen.
This comment makes no value judgement.
It’s a person by person thing and I suspect age plays a large part in feelings towards the term. In general I would say avoid the term unless it is requested.
6·2 months agoThe most Linux response. Linux doesn’t fit your use case? Clearly your use case is wrong! /s
A successful organism would not have evolved to highly express cortisol to weed itself out in the case that it has a stressful life. It makes no sense for an organism to evolve a trait that makes it at best equally likely and at worst less likely to reproduce.
The reason we release excess cortisol in modern life is because our bodies did not evolve for constantly present stressors, they evolved to be stressed in a situation, run away from the tiger, and then you’re good.
1·2 months agoThis was always the risk with unfettered solar installation. You need policies that encourage energy storage in lockstep with renewable growth. You shouldn’t risk precarity of the grid by assuming the free market will solve the issue. Grid storage is a hard problem to solve, and capitalism is bad at those.
You believe in the moon?
IT is technology so i think the I would be for engineering
Actual explanation
“Subject alternately fixates on each of two proffered snacks, before choosing one. [The image shows the] average path of the decision variable according to the Krajbich model for three parameter settings. The decision variable ramps toward the left or right choice boundaries, with the slope determined by the true relative subjective value of the items (here, left is preferred), but biased to slope toward the item currently being fixated. The biases depicted are: high (green), medium (red, as actually inferred from the data) or none (blue). Clocks depict the excess time spent looking at the left versus the right option at each step.”
TL;DR The leaning of the decision-maker is influenced by which choice they’re currently looking at, getting stronger with time, until a threshold is reached where the decision is made. A more eye-catching item is therefore more likely to be chosen because it gets more sight-time.
Link to article. Although technically OP’s image is from a paper that yoinked the left half of the figure to waffle on about some economics bs. But this is the original source.