![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
It’s a pretty standard way to write 60 votes for to 31 votes against, but again, since your comment has negative votes means you actually understood that. Negations, man. How do they work?
It’s a pretty standard way to write 60 votes for to 31 votes against, but again, since your comment has negative votes means you actually understood that. Negations, man. How do they work?
Phobia is a noun. Phobic is an adjective. I also guess since your comment has a negative number of votes, that counts as negation to your statement, so you do care and English is straightforward to you.
While I agree that my proof is blunt, yours doesn’t prove that .999… is equal to -1. With your assumption, the infinite 9’s behave like they’re finite, adding the 0 to the end, and you forgot to move the decimal point in the beginning of the number when you multiplied by 10.
x=0.999…999
10x=9.999…990 assuming infinite decimals behave like finite ones.
Now x - 10x = 0.999…999 - 9.999…990
-9x = -9.000…009
x = 1.000…001
Thus, adding or subtracting the infinitesimal makes no difference, meaning it behaves like 0.
Edit: Having written all this I realised that you probably meant the infinitely large number consisting of only 9’s, but with infinity you can’t really prove anything like this. You can’t have one infinite number being 10 times larger than another. It’s like assuming division by 0 is well defined.
0a=0b, thus
a=b, meaning of course your …999 can equal -1.
Edit again: what my proof shows is that even if you assume that .000…001≠0, doing regular algebra makes it behave like 0 anyway. Your proof shows that you can’t to regular maths with infinite numbers, which wasn’t in question. Infinity exists, the infinitesimal does not.
x=.9999…
10x=9.9999…
Subtract x from both sides
9x=9
x=1
There it is, folks.
Maybe the real cigarettes were the friends we made along the way?
So sad, Hamas using his life force as a hidden base. They truly know no shame!
You just have to appreciate the craftsmanship of a good, clever, witty insult. Can’t really get mad!
Oh it’s very unusual!
And after Turkey is done we get to live it all over again with Hungary
“Mufasa! My brother! Help me!”
“Long live the prince!”
“AAAAAAAAAAAAH”
Please drink one verification can!
You can tweak things just a bit without getting unintelligible. Like Mad Max: Fury Road using chrome as an adjective. Firefly uses shiny a lot to mean good in general.
Firefly has some language quirks, not even mentioning the fact that they swear in mandarin all the time.
It’s a march by Czech composer Julius Fučík called “Entry of the Gladiators”, written in 1897.
Edit: It gets memeier! From Wikipedia:
He originally titled it “Grande Marche Chromatique”, reflecting the use of chromatic scales throughout the piece, but changed the title based on his personal interest in the Roman Empire.
Acknowledging that they are obese is stating a fact. Claiming that they wouldn’t or couldn’t take good care of their dog because of their obesity is fat shaming. They’re not 600+lbs-can’t-leave-the-bed obese.
Yes. That’s what a refrigerator is.
So if we make up some 30 more categories with as much emission as air traffic, none of them make an impact, because they are all only about 3% of the total?
Armadillo or hedgehog probably.
Anti-trans works as an adjective in this sentence, so it is a ban that is anti-trans in nature, not a ban of anti-trans behaviour.
Your commiting a logical falacy believing that a double negative automatically means the same as no negative. “You are not allowed to not run” doesn’t mean that you are merely allowed to run, it means you must run.
Buuut again, I assume your logic means the downvotes to your comment acts like a negation to your comment and so I’m not sure what you meant.