would still get restricted because they’re contentious. Like if you start talking about how you believe in equal rights, that’s something most people agree with (at least in principle,) and it shouldn’t be political. But it’s going to ruffle some feathers anyways (especially if you get any more specific than that,) so it’d be restricted.

If this is the best example you can come up with, it is fairly unconvincing that any mainstream political will be restricted.

How is the court system more progressive than the university?

They need to get rid of all the admins and start again because that is no institute of higher education.

At the time of his death, Mr Barnett had been in Charleston for legal interviews linked to that case.

Last week, he gave a formal deposition in which he was questioned by Boeing’s lawyers, before being cross-examined by his own counsel.

He had been due to undergo further questioning on Saturday. When he did not appear, enquiries were made at his hotel.

He was subsequently found dead in his truck in the hotel car park.

Now think about how many “birds” you’ve seen that were walking or resting instead of flying. The system takes cost-effectiveness into consideration.

I don’t subscribe to Mainichi so I don’t have full access either. It seems to be an exclusive interview too which is a shame.

I’d better not catch one of you tankies complain about how capitalists can’t innovate ever again.

To be fair, books are rather ineffective at killing Palestinian children. We gave many chances to the New York Public Library, but they have failed to rectify this issue. Market efficiency says that Israel should receive those funds instead.

No more landlords? That sounds like communism.

A contrarian or a true believer?

SS zip tie

I gotta be honest. Something about that name doesn’t sit right with me.

There are some exceptions like Naughty Dog (is there another one?) that kept their quality after getting acquired. But I agree in general with your thesis.

What do you mean? Declarations such as “Health Canada recognizes the importance of meaningful engagement and ongoing dialogue with Indigenous peoples to support culturally safe implementation of MAID.” and “incarcerated persons should have the same access to healthcare, including MAID, as those living in the community” are completely normal and not at all alarming coming from the parliament.

I’m morbidly curious as to how far Canada will push euthanasia as a total percentage of all deaths. 10%? 20%? 30? I think 10% will be easily surpassed considering the rising trend and the aggressive expansionary plans of the Canadian government. I don’t like making Nazi comparison since it’s overdone, but the whole document reads like a Nazi committee note coated in inclusive language.

The entire document is just talking about how to expand and expedite the process so that physically disabled people, mentally disabled people, LGBTQ, ill children, indigenous people, people with dementia, impoverished people, and incarcerated individuals (all specifically mentioned in the document) have quick access to MAID. For example, allowing people to pre-sign their deaths before dementia since they might have trouble consenting after they have dementia.

The list looks pretty familiar except Jewish people and communists aren’t mentioned yet.

I agree. Homophobia, ableism, transphobia, and body shaming against republicans and dictators are fine.

Shame on anyone who dares use such discriminatory language against liberals. You should know better than that, bigot.

South Korea is a giant late stage capitalism so it makes perfect sense.

You are arguing that protectionism is pro-labor? I don’t think you exactly understand what marxist ideology entails. Again, you are dodging the question on whether you truly believe that labor cost is the reason for high prices in Hawaii or if you were arguing just for the sake of arguing.

Ahhh here comes the bot accusation for you liberals as always. You still haven’t shown how the Jones Act actually help workers, and are arguing for the sake of arguing if you’re committed to your bit of saying that the higher prices in Hawaii are due to labor costs.

So you are deliberately ignoring your previous point about how the main business cost and therefore the reason for the high prices in Hawaii is due to higher wages for American sailors. It’s curious how you weren’t actually arguing in good faith then.

You do realize that America as a country can simply change its regulation to stipulate equal pay and treatment for foreign crew members who dock in American ports or are employed by American companies, right? You are arguing that Americans and American companies are allowed to treat foreign workers under horrible conditions, so it is labor solidarity to employ only American workers. Do you see how deranged that sounds when we get down to the meat of it?

The West has been doing that for the past year and a half already. It’s not like putting undertrained Ukranian pilots in F-22s against Russian SAMs will affect the outcome of the war drastically.

Your bad guy, good guy view of the world is myopic.

American labor vs International labor is a false dialectic that is used to pit working class against each other by the capital. You do realize that right? How is the Jones Act about the workers as you state when it doesn’t stipulate better working conditions, better pay, or ownership in the business itself? I don’t think you’re seriously arguing that the main reason for the price gouging that is happening in Hawaii is due to higher pay for American crew members, so I’ll ignore that.

In general, Marxists are internationalists and we don’t care about protecting American workers over other workers. I would be a syndicalist if I argued for the supremacy of the union.