I’m genuinely curious, what are your standards for truth? What are your standards for facts?

Does Wikipedia use tabloids, think tanks, and literal propaganda outlets?

Is there anything that’s not factual in Wikipedia that survives their current editing process?

I’m honestly curious. I know nihilism is about life not having any objective or inherent meaning, but I don’t see how that conflicts with their motovation. Can you explain?

https://electrek.co/2016/07/05/elon-musk-tesla-autopilot-save-life/

https://electrek.co/2018/04/13/tesla-autopilot-never-perfect-10x-safer-than-human-elon-musk/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_predictions_for_autonomous_Tesla_vehicles_by_Elon_Musk

Considering Elon’s been using the two interchangeably, and that autopilot gives the lay person a false equivalence to what actual pilots use in planes. Can you really blame them?

Yeah, but given it’s an advertisement to get people into the gate, it’s understandable why they’d focus on the “free as in no need to pay” aspect

I see what you did there. I am one of those who will come after, but alas, being an old gamer means I still have to finish a list of other games

They’re discussing the “how” tho

You’ve piqued my interest. You got some o’ them links?