Unless they’re your manager. Then they stay forever or get promoted.

One of my favorites:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.09.020

It’s important that you also read the section titles.

Yeah, I feel like a good middle ground is to cite your previous work in the context of “as we previously reported,” but maybe that’s just based on something that was ingrained in me by academia. It seems tacky. My boss has no problem with it though, he’s like, “idgaf, more citations, more views, higher impact.”

I was kind of thinking of that with the institutional journal bit. It doesn’t need to be a traditional journal, the only things important to me are:

1. peer review (skip #2)

2. open access

3. professional editors to help improve phrasing, spelling, flow, etc.

4. DOI link or similar unique identifier

I’m totally down to ditch the traditional journal format otherwise. It was just a quick comment not meant to go in-depth, but point out that we already have public institutions that can host publications.

I swear it’s an official rule that reviewer 2 is required to be a huge pain in the ass.

Institutions could easily form their own journals. National organizations that provide grants could also require you to publish in their journal. Universities can run their own journals. These sorts of entities already exist and provide article access for free, publishing in them would just need to be normalized.

These are just a few options without researchers organizing anything for themselves.

The loading screen tips also begin to change as you progress, going from normal tips to lines like, “So, you think you’re a hero?”

But if you talk to them informally, they will excitedly show you pictures of cool rocks, which is neat.

This isn’t an attack on your comment, which gave quality information, but I think it’s relevant to the conversations linked in your comment.

Their definition of authoritarian is a contradiction to their actions and used subjectively. “I hate authoritarianism, so we should defederate to keep out the authoritarians.” This statement is supportive of a fundamentally authoritarian action.

This is also why people who use the term “tankies” seriously are themselves deeply unserious. Their understanding of the topic is superficial at best and colored only by Western biases rooted in anti-communist propaganda. The concept of authoritarianism was itself a product of propaganda.

Saying “no” is authoritarian. Holding elections is authoritarian. Authority itself doesn’t matter, what matters is who is in power and how they use their power to influence the world.

Some people recognize and accept this reality and then openly support the power that best aligns with their own benefit.

Anger at tankies is usually just a lack of class consciousness and ignorance based on a term that changes based on who you support and who you do not.

Yes, we just need to install water hardener systems rather than softeners to boil out the plastics!

I’m curious how effective typical household water filtration systems are in comparison. I’d expect RO systems would be effective at least.

I will try this, thank you for the advice. Normally I end up contacting the authors when I don’t have access. Some are great and respond within the hour, some never respond.

Also, thanks for carrying this community. I enjoy your posts.

Honestly, Elsevier is the worst. They tease you with those section snippets, so I scroll from the abstract and can start reading the introduction…scroll a bit more and it’s unceremoniously cut off mid-sentence. Then I rage because the article is newer than 2022 (no Sci-Hub) and my institution gets cheaper every year.

I can’t view papers I’ve published in some journals anymore. When I see this, I think: “Why don’t we subscribe to papers we are actively publishing in?? Why aren’t all of the papers I want to read published in open access journals?? Why did I contribute to a journal that wasn’t open access??”

How dare you not share the reference in a link too!

The CaCO3 concentration where boiling was most effective (>80% of the measured polymers removed) was >120 mg/L. This is hard water, so if your local area doesn’t have particularly hard water, this method won’t be effective.

A very general guide for the US on hard water levels by state.

Hmm I’m using a mobile app and it showed a combined score <1 when I commented, which only happens from down-votes. Now I’m seeing +2 on the app and in a browser, so maybe what I was seeing before wasn’t accurate?

Lol, you got down-voted for mentioning a real US law that’s been in existence for over 20 years. Someone doesn’t like reality.

Vote harder and maybe Genocide Joe will get to keep building his legacy for another 4 years.

Amazon’s working on it. Just gotta get those company towns in place.

Afaik, all modern browsers can import/export passwords and bookmarks? FF lets you set up an account and sync across devices with a unique PW if you want (not your computer user PW, but it could be).

No idea on touchscreens outside the Android app.

Great, now we need to run the experiment with the bowling ball and feather on opposite sides of the planet!

It’s not necessarily that you hear more than someone else, but you have the experience to have trained your hearing to discern those sounds.

It’s something I also experience from my time working around machines. Works on all sorts of things.