Hamas wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for Israel’s decades of cruel actions and more recently allowing of funding.

Don’t forget the U.S. and Israel killing (often literally) any moderate voice in Palestine

Yeah that’s a totally incoherent set of positions; par for the course for Americans on foreign policy

Packing the court is probably the “easiest” route.

Do they? Pretty sure lots of people would reject an idea like “maybe we should just kill disabled people” whatever you call it.

As an expert in “hugely hammered,” I’ll believe it when I see it.

Ok, now make an argument for Harris that isn’t “Trump Bad”

We know he is, the problem is Harris is bad, too.

I will very much enjoy not being rounded up by the Department of Homeland Security for it.

Run this one by all the people beaten and arrested for protesting the genocide we’re funding in Palestine.

If Trump gets elected again… I think the possibility of Palestinians getting exterminated becomes a genuine possibility, and the damage to our climate and our ability to reverse course after four years look very fragile.

Biden has given unconditional support to Israel, and had even circumvented Congress to give them more material support. Biden has not only done nothing of substance to fight climate change, but has approved more federal oil drilling permits than Trump.

If Trump did the things Biden did, Democrats would correctly call him a war criminal and threat to the planet.

No chance he backs out of the debate. He loves the audience, knows backing out would look weak, and he’s not going to have the polling lead he’d have had against Biden.

Everyone involved in covering up his senility should resign or be forced out.

As soon as the land of any country has all become private property, the landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed, and demand a rent even for its natural produce.

Card-carrying member of the Communist Party Adam Smith

Maybe the market isn’t the best way to distribute a basic human need

In the same breath, libs will thank the Secret Service for immediately killing the shooter and also say “violence is never an acceptable response.”

That’s probably the most succinct way to state the contradiction. You’re OK with taking out an active shooter, but not with taking out someone who (as libs love to tell you) is about to hurt or kill people all over the world?

This is the guy Democrats are “triangulating” towards

You care more about posting etiquette than you do about Canadian parliament applauding a Nazi.

This story has circulated widely enough (I see multiple articles on BBC and CBS, among other outlets) that they had to issue an apology. I don’t believe you haven’t heard of it, but if you really haven’t, what does that say about where you’re getting your news/what draws your attention?

Do you have even the slightest problem with Canadian parliament applauding a Nazi? You and a bunch of other people here seem to think litigating how to post is more important than the actual issue.

Here’s the news story if you missed the dozen other threads on it and the discussion elsewhere in this thread. Let me know if you need anything else spoonfed to you.

The Canadian parliament gave one of these Nazis a standing ovation within the past week.

The point is that who that guy was should be no surprise to anyone, because this all has been public knowledge since (at least) Windows 95.

This is relevant context to the recent incident of the Canadian parliament giving a standing ovation to one of these Nazis.

Holy shit, read what you respond to

The guy criticizing Canada for knowingly admitting Nazis is somehow a Nazi?

Sharp as a cue ball, this one

“I’m lazy” is your argument here? Even the blurb from the start of the article says this immigration happened in 1950.

Did history start yesterday? Are we ever allowed to discuss the background of current events?