Obviously no one’s saying that, but thanks for your contribution.
Obviously no one’s saying that, but thanks for your contribution.
It’s far too late for baby steps
Literally the next sentence in the article:
Digital wallets […] have exploded in popularity but are not captured by Australian payments law.
The article doesn’t bother explaining what specifically the law does.
Isn’t their pricing per month not per query?
OP said “only available for Arch” not “only packaged for Arch”. These are not remotely the same thing.
What software only works on Arch? If anything I see stuff that’s packaged for arch but can be installed from source on other distros without issue.
Ubuntu-only software, on the other hand, is infuriating
It’s a brand exposure exercise… why are you helping the crypto scammers increase their brand exposure?
Per the article:
Scott Gessler, a former Colorado secretary of state representing Trump in the case, opposed it. He said a protective order was unnecessary because threats and intimidation already are prohibited by law.
And then they don’t explain further
I host my own, on a server in a data center on IP space owned by a friend of mine. I use mailcow for software.
“bulb” appears to be what my phone incorrects the term “vuln” to. I have updated my comment
The thing that’s known about is the payload not the vulnerability. They keep finding new vulns and dropping the same payload.
They’ve gone in on matrix pretty hard at this point