That pilot needed to stand out to not be sent to Ukraine lol

If you are in literal, actual mortal danger you are generally allowed to escape with the goal of escape. Especially relevant where waymo operates.

Edit: rereading this, I read it inverse last time.

How is tribal level homophobia and contract based marriage a new idea to Abrahamic religions? It’s literally in the ancient texts, which they follow (increasingly, the more Orthodox the group)

Edit edit therefore I disagree with the premise. They are indeed PRESENT currently, and a serious issue, all over the world. But they aren’t new. It was pretty hard to be “industrial” at much of anything many hundreds of years ago, but that doesn’t mean bigotry and tribalism weren’t widespread.

I’m not discounting the conversation on military tech and such, I’m just staying focused on the point I made.

Obviously my comment on “modern” relates to social topics, like marriage equality.

A middle eastern country with a dominant Abrahamic religion has tribalistic, disrespectful marriage laws? What a surprise.

I think it’s crazy how Israel tries to pass as “modern”

Just work your shift

And “that’s a nice washing machine, while looting it I should try to carry it in the open during an active firefight”

Acknowledged on the sub we are in…

But incest irl is usually an abuse of power dynamic.

Edit removed what could be considered presumptive conclusions on my part.

Removed by mod

Reported

Removed by mod

Huh? Does that imply a good reason?

Further, that’s not the point at all. The point is those CALLING/WISHING for violence are dreaming that their group will win, that their ideas will be forwarded.

Mike Jones

And they want people off the vesting ramp as early as possible.

Amazon does 5-15-40-40

But whyyy

It’s just privilege all the way down. If you’re ok with trump, or not worried about him, you’re just riding the ivory tower

Ty

Can you link to beyond pdf? I’m always interested in good pdf parsers. But I ge t a bunch of dnd stuff just googling it

I never walk away with an “answer” without having it:

1. Cite the source
2. Lookup the source
3. Permlink you to the source page/line as available
4. Critique the validity of the source.

After all that, still remain skeptical and take the discussion as a starting point to find your own primary sources.

Sometimes, sure. Somewhat different disciplines but, some folks high up enough certainly play both investments.