• 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 17th, 2024

help-circle









  • Completely agree with you on the first part. My point is that:

    • Long term storage in a non-trivial thing to do, from a technical, social and ecological POV. However, it can be build, as shown in the linked documentary.
    • Not going nuclear has disadvantages (that IMO out number the advantages).
    • Going nuclear also has disadvantages. Thus, the view of experts on the field has a big importance of the topic. In this matter, the consensus I most commonly find in the physicists community is that nuclear is a energy source that should replace carbon/coal, but needs to be complemented with solar/wind/water/thermal, not just disregarded.

    I would like to add that I did not try to call you dumb, I’m sorry if that’s the way it ended up sounding like. The dumb part was directed to the people in charge of the decisions, not you.






  • Danitos@reddthat.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlzodiac sign
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Disagree on the semantics. Physical realities are concepts as well. “Energy”, despite being an extremely useful physical measurement, is an abstract concept. “Physical realities” and “concepts” are not mutually exclusive nor antonymous words.

    In this case, the Aries/vernal point is a concept used to define coordinate systems using physical measures from Earth.