Archangel

That is a very good point.

They didn’t really, though. They gave him immunity from being prosecuted for what he does as president…but that doesn’t mean everything he does is legal. His orders can still be struck down in court (or at least they should be).

The problem right now, is the fact that he is just ignoring the court’s orders. That is still illegal, even if he may not necessarily be prosecuted for it later. We’ll see what happens though. At some point the law needs to either hold up against him, or it means nothing, and the Constitution itself is no longer valid.

Did any of these people even try and explain to him how tariffs actually work…or was that a step too far?

Who’s going to stop him? At this point, it seems pretty obvious he can just do whatever he wants. The Constitution is dead, right along with the Judiciary’s authority to challenge him.

And Harvard tuition fees go, “Brrrrrrrrrr!”

Considering this word really applies most to people like Joe Rogan, I find this whole thing pretty ironic.

Why would they need to “smuggle” him back into the country? He’s an innocent man, wrongfully incarcerated in a foreign prison. What the fuck is wrong with these assholes?

Seriously. That option needs to be removed from the Charter. I haven’t heard one instance where it was used in a positive way. It’s always to do something that violates someone else’s rights.

Who?

He is the most healthy human being in all of history. No one is healthier or stronger than Donald Trump. He has the body of a 30 year old athlete and the mind of a genius.

So the trick to getting away with doing shit like this is to just be open about it? Weird. If that was the case, then why not give these Democrats a pass, as well? They aren’t exactly hiding it either.

Or are you just getting these four mixed up with the 200 others that didn’t support this legislation?

I’m fine calling out the 2% of Democrats that vote against their own constituents interests. But what I find hilarious, is the total lack of focus on the fact that 100% of Republicans are behind this.

This is what Chomsky was talking about when he wrote manufacturing consent. The framing here is massively deceptive, to the point of being completely backwards…and folks just eat it up this way. They swallow this narrative whole, and spit it back up for others to swallow.

So, even more evidence of insider trading? Too bad they cut funding to all the agencies responsible for dealing with this kind of corruption.

I love how they never once mention in the article that Republicans wrote the bill, proposed it, and 100% of them voted in favor of it.

But, despite all that…the headline still reads, “Democrats passed it”.

Just smash. It will be satisfying.

JFC. I can’t believe there are still folks out there that fall for this crap.

That’s good…because I can never actually read the Globe and Mail.

Consumers are the victims here. No one actually cares about their “feelings”.

Good thing he defunded all those regulatory agencies, then. /s

Using rally sizes to determine levels of actual support, makes no sense. So what if “thousands” of people showed up. What if that’s everyone. Then you’re just bragging about how 0.001% of the total population is on your side.

And even if only 10% of your total supporters showed up. That’s still a tiny number of actual people.