- Previous images of Neptune and Uranus, particularly from Voyager 2, were inaccurately blue and green due to image processing for detail enhancement.
- New research analyzed data from Hubble and VLT telescopes to reveal their “true” colors are both a similar shade of greenish-blue.
- Neptune still has a slightly bluer tinge due to a thinner haze layer.
- Uranus may appear slightly greener in summer/winter but bluer in spring/autumn due to its unique tilt.
- This research corrects a long-held misconception about these distant planets.
Am I missing something, or does Uranus look almost exactly the same in the Voyager 2 and reprocessed images? The reprocessed one just looks a tiny bit brighter.
Somebody bleached Uranus
There’s really not much in it, I can kinda see it’s slightly less green as well as brighter like you say.
Crap, how will we be able to tell Titania vs Triton colonies in future geoguessr now?
"geo"guessr will need to come up with a new name lol
Are you telling me we’ll have to find new words for every world’s "geo"graphy and "geo"logy too? That won’t be convenient.
Honestly I think we should just not bother settling other planets. The headache of updating all our dictionaries won’t be worth it.
I propose Stellography
There already are, for example geography on Mars is areography and on the Moon it’s selenography. This post has a list of some of them.
However, English is whatever we say it is, and most people just use “geography” for everything and specify “Martian geography” or “Lunar geography” when the distinction needs to be made.
I can see your true colors shining through.
Of course if you care to look carefully, and sometimes closely.
Huhuhuhuhuh
Can we rename Neptune to “Smaller Uranus”? I couldn’t tell the difference if they weren’t shown together.
