Title. :)

  • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    WD Green /shrug

    I’ve been using all Red Pros since I first built my nas, but it started with a couple of green 2TB that where in there for like 7 years before being replaced (didn’t die yet)

    • indigomirage@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had WD Greens in my first NAS (they were HDDs, though). This was ill-advised. Definitely better for power consumption, but they took forever to spin up for access to the point where it seemed like the NAS was always on the fritz.

      Now I swear by WD Red. Much, much better (in my use case).

      (I’m not sure how things pan out in SSD land though. Right now it’s just too pricey for me to consider.)

      • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I was using HDDs, and I believe it may have been a little less of an issue bc I had Unraid configured to keep the drives spun up (I’ve read the spin up is hard on the drive, not so much the time being spun up)

        But I did occasionally have some IOWait issues. Reds plus a NVME cache has resolved all those issues.

    • ReducedArc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Same, we’re ones of dozens I’m sure but I’ve been running a mix of WD greens and Seagate barracudas in a hardware RAID5 array for over a decade. Only had 2 drive failures over the entire time with no data loss. But yeah… would advise against that if possible