I have my problems with Meta, but I’m hoping this will help Mastodon grow

  • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    This may be a cynical view, but even if that does happen, the core ActivityPub protocol will still be intact and at worst be relegated to a small community of tech nerds, which is to say, basically the status quo.

    • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The core of the software will be intact, but the community will be broken - because once Threads pulls the plug (EEE), instead of a stable community you’ll have a shrinking one.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or from another angle, they won’t be able to entirely pull the plug. If they try to but users still want to be on mastodon, they can find another way.

        That said, I support the immediate defederation with any threads instances.

        • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          They can pull it - most users in Threads will be interacting with other Threads users and content. Mastodon will be simply “that ideologically weird corner”, and in practice they won’t miss it.

          For scale: Threads currently has 100M users. The Fediverse as a whole has 1.5M.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            And I think that will go both ways. I mean, we all already have the option of joining threads right now to interact with those 100M users but I have a feeling most that are here aren’t.

            Their joining the fediverse will be more disruptive than their leaving it I think. And that’s not even considering the higher costs to anyone running instances, since all that extra volume won’t be processed and stored for free (though admittedly I am not familiar with the implementation details of how federated content is handled).

            • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Their joining the fediverse will be more disruptive than their leaving it I think

              Eternal September-like? It’s possible.

            • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’m counting only monthly active users, for both sides. FediDB lists 1.2M for the Fediverse, your link lists 1.7M of them.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      the core ActivityPub protocol will still be intact

      Will it though? My guess is they’re working on “fixing it” to what they want 24/7.