U.S. issues warning to NVIDIA, urging to stop redesigning chips for China::undefined

  • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Absolute boneheaded move by NVIDIA. Guess they just saw dollar signs and stopped thinking. What I don’t get is they are already at like 300% capacity I don’t think there will be any business short falls from selling only to US customers

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I think it’s quite clever actually.

      They clearly realise that if China can’t buy their chips, the CPC will put the full force of a planned economy behind making their own. Once that happens cheap Chinese AI chips will eat their lunch.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Everyone thought that would happen with Huawei. What actually happened was a whole bunch of major countries banned Huawei imports and a lot of the ones that allowed them in are having second thoughts. Germany, for example, is in the early discussion phase to remove Huawei equipment (which is already deployed) from their cell network.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly. They want to maintain their insane margins with their oligopoly. The second you get a viable cheap competitor, it will all come crashing down.

        Of course, it’s a massive undertaking to catch up enough to be feasible. But China has the manufacturing experience, and a government initiative could allocate an insane amount of resources behind it if they were motivated to.

        So it’s obviously in NVidia’s best interest to deter it with appeasement.

        • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Also I assume things move much faster there unlike here where every move needs to be scrutinised and approved by 400 different people on 350 different committees.

            • Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Depends. Most of them turn into inefficient corruption at every level. China is a bit unique where they have corruption at every level, but also fall in line or get axed whenever there’s a big initiative that has too much visibility.

              Results vary widely. But at least things get made, big and fast. Quality on the other hand…

              • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Sure, both will be, corruption is an inefficiency. But the authoritarian society is more egotistic, imo because of the power structure and hierarchy. Like companies meddling in politicians is an inefficiency existing in both

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Really, the only big market that is being targeted by the restrictions is Mainland China (pointedly not including Russia because it’s honestly not a very big market compared to like… New York State or Texas or California). Nvidia would have been fine.

      I think you’re right: they got greedy (shocking, I know)

      • bobgusford@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Large tech companies have been known to buy out smaller competitors before they become a threat or before somebody else buys them out. Not being able to do so with a government-funded Chinese company, I imagine killing the idea before it takes shape is a prudent business decision.

    • guacupado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      What I don’t get is they are already at like 300% capacity I don’t think there will be any business short falls from selling only to US customers

      Because capitalism is about making EVEN MORE the next year. And EVEN MORE the year after that.