silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 11 months ago22 Countries Pledge to Triple Nuclear Capacity in Push to Cut Fossil Fuelswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up163arrow-down1external-link22 Countries Pledge to Triple Nuclear Capacity in Push to Cut Fossil Fuelswww.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
Given the high cost and long lead times involved, I’m incredibly dubious about this one actually happening.
minus-squareRGB3x3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·11 months agoBecause nuclear has WAY more power generation than other renewables. Solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro won’t be able to keep up with electricity demand if we want to eliminate fossil fuels. The power density of nuclear just can’t be matched.
minus-squareHugohase@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoAre you sure about that? I just mean on account of that no being true!
Because nuclear has WAY more power generation than other renewables.
Solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro won’t be able to keep up with electricity demand if we want to eliminate fossil fuels. The power density of nuclear just can’t be matched.
Are you sure about that? I just mean on account of that no being true!