• KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What? A pickup uses 15-28 l/100km.

    A Silverado uses 15MPG, according to GM themselves. That’s like 16l/100km

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yeah pickups and SUVs are gas guzzlers. i get about 5.5L/100km with my Honda Fit

      • KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ya I don’t know why I’m being down voted for saying what my cars get. Never said anything better didn’t exist, just asked which other cars get less.

        I fucking hate Lemmy. I asked a question and I’m downvoted. Fuck this place. There’s no way to have a god damn discussion here.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          People probably misread the intended question as denial of lower consumptions cars existing. The interwebs are fickle

        • wieson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’d love to know which cars you drive with 5-6 l/100km

          Could be an inquiry, could be a statement of disbelief. Up to interpretation.

          I’d love to know which cars you drive with 5-6 l/100km lol

          The “lol” at the end makes it read like your accusing the other commenter of lying and that you think this is an impossible to reach fuel consumption.

          Additionally, many people don’t like huge pickup trucks and worshippers thereof. You might have slipped into that category in their understanding.

    • onion@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      A Polo 3-cylinder runs at around 5.5l/100km mixed city/interstate. 16l is atrocius