trevwilson@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoGlad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up11.45Karrow-down129
arrow-up11.42Karrow-down1imageGlad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversitylemmy.worldtrevwilson@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-squarePyff Daddy@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoIt’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.
minus-squareStinkywinks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoPfffffft, sounds like a load of bs. What about Brazilians?
minus-squarePyff Daddy@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoBrazilian isn’t a race, and Black isn’t a nationality. Incredibly, it’s even possible to be both. I hope your confusion has been cleared up.
minus-squareStinkywinks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYou said Asians. So what about Persians?
It’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.
Pfffffft, sounds like a load of bs. What about Brazilians?
Brazilian isn’t a race, and Black isn’t a nationality. Incredibly, it’s even possible to be both. I hope your confusion has been cleared up.
You said Asians. So what about Persians?