As the title says. I severely dislike having to make accounts for every game publisher that wants to send me advertisements, collect data or whatever.

It’s usually an instant dealbreaker for me at this point

Publishers needing their own launcher already puts them on shaky grounds with me.

But I really liked the original BG 1 & 2, so I’m willing to not just refund it immediately and actually ask around first for solutions.

  • punter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For me it chose direct x so I had to use the launcher. Vulcan is much better for me (just be sure to not use triple buffer for nvidia cards). Just choose skip and check the box that says ‘do not ask again’ and the launcher is less aggravating.

    • Avanera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What differences do you see when you use Vulcan? And what’s the deal with triple buffering?

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Triple buffering basically means that the GPU can temporarily store frames in three different locations in VRAM. This has implications for smoothness and frame time, so it should in theory always be the best option for v-sync and avoiding tearing.

        Vulcan should be more efficient so you should get somewhat better performance, though my understanding is it depends on card (AMD cards are kind of designed for Vulkan, but not so much nvidia cards).

      • punter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My experience is that the directx reflections and post processing look worse. Triple buffering on was causing screen tears.