Features

  • Support multiple shells: bash/zsh/powershell/fish/nushell/elvish/xonsh
  • Support multiple platforms: windows/macOS/linux
  • Built-in completions for 1000+ commands (full list)
  • Automatically generate completion script from help-text/man-page
  • Lazy completing, lower memory consumption and faster startup time
  • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve not used it yet, but I found bash-completion to be lacking quite often. Completion is one reason I’m using fish atm.

    But from the looks of it it’s exactly what bash/zsh is missing for me.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve used zsh for it’s support for posix sh and have my config. But I find fish to be faster with the features I want and it has those features ootb.

        Maybe I’ll give zsh another try.