• Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Stray Bullet” makes it sound like the bullet got off leash. This was a reckless and irresponsible use of firearms and we should start calling it that.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Irresponsible use of firearms in an irresponsible gun culture. Toxic combo.

      • AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        58
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sounds like you’re conflating gangbangers who post tiktok videos of themselves blasting the air with the 1/3-1/2 of normal humans in American households who own guns.

        The real problem here seems to have been the court confusing a gangbanger for a human who can integrate into society.

            • AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              As a matter of fact, it is a subscription, and it’s exactly how the right to privacy, right to not self-incriminate, due process in general, and “beyond a reasonable doubt” work: on the principle that it’s better that some evil people will get off and reoffend than it is for innocent people to be incarcerated for failing to prove their innocence. Not how it always works when prosecutors and judges have a different personal philosophy, but that’s the idea and the trade-off taken.

              • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, it’s not. Suffering death is the cost of not having the rights to live. Death is the cost of winning those rights. You believe it’s a subscription service because you haven’t won those rights yet and you’re still paying the cost of not having the right to live.

                • AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not sure you fully understand the words you’re saying, “right to live” would necessarily demand compelling people to act in the furtherance of everyone else’s lives. You could be held criminally liable for eating too much for example, because you’re taking away resources needed to keep others alive, and your unhealthy lifestyle taxing the health system actively hurts those who need it more.

                  You’re looking for a different kind of government altogether.

                  • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    There is a surplus of resources, that’s a strawman argument.

                    Taxes on unhealthy items such as cigarettes and recreational drugs, and sugar exist, these are how you account for those issues of behavioural social damage and the imbalance in cost of social healthcare.

                    You could be held criminally liable for eating too much for example, because you’re taking away resources needed to keep others alive

                    Yes, we should do this. Let’s start with the billionaires and see if everyone has enough then.

    • GreenM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shhh, in the US they are very strongly against making sure gun owners are properly tested for how to operate guns and psychological state they are in. Rumors say it could lead to less shooting incidents but it obviously can’t be true because. … eh… amendment yes amendment !