• flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    if you are legal enough to be allowed to work and it not considered child labor, and paying taxes on that income, then vote often!

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hm, if I understand you right, you’re saying that there’s there’s a sort of threshold of governance (eg you mention legally being allowed to work, and being required to pay taxes) that, once met, requires that those under such governance must have representation in the government. So, by that logic, would you then be okay with children not being allowed to vote if, say, they weren’t allowed to work, and didn’t have to pay taxes?

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        If a child is still legally the responsibility of its parents or guardians then the guardians would be responsible for making sure they vote in the best interests of the child. See also what’s happening in America (my country of residence) - a lot of fascists are voting in ways that will directly harm their lives. I could make an argument those decisions harm the children as well.

        I feel like the line of questioning is a trying to head down a reductio ad absurdum path…

        • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          So only legally emancipated children that also have jobs should be allowed to vote? That is a small and unusual subset of children.

          • flandish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            well it was asked. also no not “that also” it was “or”.

            and it wasn’t “that have jobs” it was “and are responsible for their own finances.” A manager who manages a child actor is, provably also an adult.

            this is about two things:

            a person’s relationship to capital and wage; a person’s relationship to the source of a state’s income. (taxes)

            if a state can take taxes it can provide suffrage.

            • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Lots and lots of people- from tourists to 10 year old kids to illegal immigrants- pay taxes and do not receive suffrage. I don’t know if you are actually arguing that everyone who pays taxes should be able to vote or just playing devils advocate.

              • flandish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I am 100%* arguing that if someone pays tax they should be allowed to vote. Unironically. Completely. Does this mean that if tourists need to be excluded, ok. One can do so by many means: citizenship requirements or even simpler, a process in which taxes are not charged to tourists similar to that duty free concept.

                On the subject of illegal immigrants - Citizenship should be a 15 minute process, if we’re going to assume nations should exist at all. If nations “must” exist and therefore “must” tax, the moment an immigrant pays is the moment they become a citizen.

                *: (you’re talking with an anarchist here; if nations must exist and must extract taxes… Then the replies hold to that mindset. I personally do not think they should exist. But they do [except israel]. So that’s the scope of these replies.)