TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 天前Say Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagatewww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square264linkfedilinkarrow-up1620arrow-down19
arrow-up1611arrow-down1external-linkSay Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagatewww.vice.comTheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 天前message-square264linkfedilink
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 天前I would assume with arrays they will use a different way to calculate parity or have higher redundancy to compensate the risk.
minus-squareFrezik@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 天前If there’s higher redundancy, then they are already giving up on density. We’ve pretty much covered the likely ways to calculate parity.
I would assume with arrays they will use a different way to calculate parity or have higher redundancy to compensate the risk.
If there’s higher redundancy, then they are already giving up on density.
We’ve pretty much covered the likely ways to calculate parity.