Corgi Lemmings
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day ago

On trees...

mander.xyz

message-square
149
fedilink
1.21K

On trees...

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day ago
message-square
149
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    theres also a definition of a what a tree in the sense , its develops wood, many things are tree like, but not trees: such as palms(just overgrown herbs), dracaena( aka cabbage tree, they have something dracenoid thickining.) extinct plants like giant lycophytes and ferns

  • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Arborization !

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Or maybe the microorganisms and food sources that life forms are exposed to have more of an effect on how the macroorganisms evolve than is currently talked about, which would explain why so many things in similar environments evolve similar traits.

  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I wasn’t ready for how weird this comment section turned out to be…

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There are fern trees, conifer trees, and flowering trees. Where are my moss trees?

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      https://gobotany.nativeplanttrust.org/species/dendrolycopodium/dendroideum/

      https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/204198-Dendrolycopodium-obscurum

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Same for roots, btw, just earlier.

  • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m a billion years, crabs will start turning into trees and trees into crabs. merging into the ubercreature

    • Atlas_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I imagine it’ll look like paras

      • multifariace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Paras is a fungus. Totally different thing.

        • Atlas_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Ah you’re right. Torterra then

          • bpev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Torterra is a tortoise. Totally different thing.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I’m a billion years

      Damn. You look good for your age.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’d argue, but I agree. I don’t need to know how they look, if they’re a billion years and capable of communicating, whatever state they’re in looks good. Even if its a fungus posessed rot monster.

        • ladicius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Like a tree, for example.

    • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “ubercreature” excuse me, lichen would like a word with you

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        lichen is the shit

    • VernetheJules [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      you may not like it but Ms Crabtree is what peak performance looks like

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I think palm trees are a kind of grass

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So is corn

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        And banana

    • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I didn’t know that and I agree

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’m firmly in this camp.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So if you look at a tiny blade of grass and a gigantic tree its like looking at a Chihuahua and a brachiosaurus. And there are smaller things and bigger things in the aminal kingdum!

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Also cool that for a period of like 60 million years, nothing decomposed dead trees. As they would die or fall over, they’d just stay there, piling up. This is where most oil came from. The massive amounts of trees stacking up before bacteria and fungus evolved to decomposed them. Imagine 60 million years worth of trees just lying around.

    *Thought I’d add an edit, since this post got quite a few eyes on it: It was mostly coal that all those trees turned into. Not oil.

    • Ileftreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I thought that was coal

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Mushrooms are the great undertaker, the great decomposer. The Langoliers. They are just waiting to eat you, and they’re happy to share their fruits in the meantime. They’re fattening you up. They can wait.

      • voracread@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That Langoliers reference spotted in the wild!

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I remember a flimsy tv film with even flimsier CGI spherical creatures eating the planet

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Now we do the dance of joy!

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I imagine dead trees were flammable, even back then. And oxygen levels were 15% higher. Can you imagine the forest fires?

      • Crassus@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Fire wasn’t invented back then

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And after it was invented, it was only in black and white until the 1950s

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        deleted by creator

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Didn’t those trees become coal, not oil?

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes. I made mention of this in a reply to someone else as well. I’m not sure if my teacher (like 30 years ago) told us wrong or if I simply remembered it wrong.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        I think near water they became oil and far from water they became coal

        • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          ·
          22 hours ago

          No, most coal comes from plants in swamps, because the water helped preserve the organic matter.

          Plants in swamps die -> organic matter on the bottom of the swamp -> peat -> brown coal -> black coal.

          Oil apparently comes mostly from plankton.

          On the different origins: https://www.carboeurope.org/how-are-fossil-fuels-formed-the-science-behind-oil-coal-and-natural-gas/

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Cool

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Oil was effectively plankton and other sea stuff.

          Coal was forests.

    • ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I love this fact, and am curious where you learned it?

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I learned it nearly 30 years ago in school. I just did a search and found a link about it, though.

        Also, seems that either I remembered wrongly, or my teacher made a mistake, but it seems it was most of the worlds coal; not oil, that came from all the piles of trees from that period.

        https://www.thorogood.co.uk/treevolution-how-trees-came-first-and-rot-came-later-in-earths-deep-past/

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Correct. In theory, we could make more oil in the lab. We cannot make more coal, because the wood will get broken down by bacteria far before it turns to peat, lignite, sub-bituminous, or bituminous coal, and much less anthracite.

  • Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    By the logic we are not humans…

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      no, we didn’t have mice and also ants evolve into humans… there’s one distinct line of ancestors…
      it’s called convergent evolution. check out wikipedia

  • hash@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 day ago

    So that’s why every stargate planet looks like Canada

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That and every Stargate planet is Vancouver

    • Knuschberkeks@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Sadly Lemmy isn’t big enough to support niche communities, but I really enjoyed r/unexpectedstargate back in the day.

      • kelseybcool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Isn’t big enough yet ❤️

    • ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      🤣🤣🤣

  • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    1 day ago

    Had to look it up because I didnt beleive

    sure enough its correct

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Something poetic and quaint about a link to a Wikipedia article titled “Tree”

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        reddit has broken me. I was expecting it to point to weed.

        • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 day ago

          Here you go.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree

          • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Reddit has broken me. I was expecting a rickroll

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              sooo glad I wasn’t alone.

              anyhow, here’s a fun song.

        • Rusty@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          I was expecting an undirected acyclic graph.

          • ch00f@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Yo momma so fat she sat on a binary tree and squashed it into a linked list in O(1) time.

            • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              is a binary tree equivalent to a 2D KD-tree ?

            • LeFantome@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              That happens to me constantly

  • m_xy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    here’s a cool blog post that expands on this There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically)

    i didn’t even put it in a bookmark folder, it’s just loose on my bookmark bar because it’s such an interesting post that i reread from time to time

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Very cool read, thank you

    • Thadden@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      That was a very fun and interesting reading! Thanks for sharing

    • bananabenana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maybe…but I doubt many of these phylogenies use DNA, and if so, likely only a single or few genes. Nowhere near enough resolution to accurately determine genetic relatedness. Woody plants may actually be more related than we think.

      These sorts of phylogenies tend to use morphological characteristics which is an unreliable measure of genetic relatedness.

      I will stand corrected if wrong though

  • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    My sister in law recently quipped that “Trees are a social construct” and at first I thought she was just being glib but now I can’t get that statement out of my head.

    • resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      I listen to a podcast called Completely Arbortrary. They talk about a different tree species each episode. They say trees are a strategy, not a strict definition.

      • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Thanks! Just subscribed. See they have a couple Metasequoia episodes -a favorite of mine .

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • [email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Biology and Life Sciences

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • !reptiles and [email protected]

Physical Sciences

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • !self [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Memes

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Miscellaneous

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.43K users / day
  • 4.91K users / week
  • 9.32K users / month
  • 24.5K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 14.7K subscribers
  • 4.64K Posts
  • 119K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org