Just to be clear, I do think the obvious solution to terrible things like this is vastly expanded public transit so that people don’t have to rely on cars to get everywhere, not overhyped technology and driving aids that are still only marginally better than a human driver. I just thought the article was interesting.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Wait. Those things rely on visual sensors only?? That moronic! I mean, more so that I originally though. Please tell me that they have them, but this particular one was malfunctioning.

    Edit: holy crap. How are these vehicles allowed to operate on public roads??

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Musk has sai d multiple times that humans can drive with vision alone, so cars shouldn’t need LIDAR.

      He ignores that humans also regularly experience optical illusions that contribute to poor driving and collisions, and that LIDAR is far less susceptible to such abberations.

    • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Very early on, Tesla used lidar radar in addition to optical sensors. However, they only use optical sensors today and have for a while. Like many of the poor decisions at that company, the change to optical-only was made at Musk’s demand.

      Edit: misremembered, it was radar not lidar as pointed out below

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Correct they’ve never used lidar. However I will say that no manufacturer has actually solved the self-driving issue yet so nobody can definitively say what is and isn’t required.