The map will likely add a Black — and Democratic — member to the delegation.

A federal court has picked Alabama’s new congressional map, which will likely result in an additional Black — and Democratic — member in the delegation.

The new map came after the same panel of federal judges twice found that lines drawn by the GOP-dominated Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by weakening the power of Black voters. The new lines will be used for at least the 2024 elections, the state’s Republican secretary of state said on Thursday, though Alabama Republicans have vowed to fight them for future cycles.

The map gives greater electoral power to Black residents, who make up about one-quarter of the state’s population. And it will very likely mean Republicans lose one seat in their thin majority, imperiling their already tenuous hold on the lower chamber even before battleground districts come into play.

  • Hairyblue@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    11 个月前

    So justice?

    Alabama Republicans are terrible. Stop voting for them.

    I live in Alabama and I am angry about what is happening with Christianity being promoted by our government. Everyone in Alabama is not Christian. We want our government to be secular so it is fair to everyone here.

    Everyone be sure to vote.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 个月前

      Stop voting for them before they make it so no votes matter.

      Because that’s the goal. Turning down the dial on democracy enough that they get to maintain permanent, unquenchable power.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 个月前

    Imagine if all the red states where the GQP electorally assaulted the voting districts (and it was almost all of them, thanks ALEC) had to go to the goddamned supreme court to get it resolved which the arrogant GQP then flat-out refused to do! JUST to eke out a sliver of balance back to these extremely unfair maps.

    See more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2021/nov/12/gerrymander-redistricting-map-republicans-democrats-visual

    Cheaters. Crooked as sweet fuck-all, no wonder they love that orange rapist shitbag.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 个月前

      I mean, this literally used to be part of the Voting Rights Act, that states with a history of racist gerrymandering would have to get federal clearance on things like their election maps.

      That’s what Shelby County v. Holder was about. Making it easier for states to engage in racist gerrymandering because the conservative justices like it.

      They claimed the preclearance requirements were unconstitutional because they were based on old data (not a legitimate reason to find it unconstitutional) in spite of the fact that the VERY CASE THEY WERE RULING ON proved the exact relevant need for the law they were striking down.

  • swm5126@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 个月前

    This is good news. Does Alabama have some way to wriggle out of it though? I feel like something similar has happened in other states and then they get to claim it’s too close to the election or something. Or in some cases just don’t do it. But I admittedly don’t know the differences between state and federal cases in those other ones so maybe this is different?

    • frustratedphagocytosis@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 个月前

      They already got away with using the map that was unconstitutional because it was too close to the 2022 election! This takes entirely too long to remedy, and there’s no making up for the consequences of gerrymandering since no one goes back to redo elections.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 个月前

    Interesting thing about the “minority majority” part of the Voting Rights Act is that in more purpley states it hurts Democrats by packing a huge number of them in one district, so they win the one district 90%-10% and then lose the surrounding districts 40%-60%.

    But in the super red states, it puts a floor on the number of Democratic districts, as seen in this example.

    • quindraco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 个月前

      No, that’s a terrible idea. Gerrymandering will only end when we stop having humans draw inherently biased maps and instead have a computer use an open source algorithm that produces an objectively fair map.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 个月前

        I don’t know of any objectively fair algorithms for drawing districts. Doing it in a way that seems mathematically sensible is very likely to create structural biases the same way the politically neutral rules about House and Senate representation end up structurally favouring Republicans and rural voters.

      • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 个月前

        I don’t think it’s possible to make an unbiased algorithm. Algorithms inherently have the bias of their creators. People will find ways to game the algorithm. Computer drawn maps are just opening up another can of worms. The best solution is MMP.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 个月前

        Ok instead all the fourth graders in every school district have to put a pin where there home is on the state map.

        We take the mean location of those sets and extend Voronois around them to the state lines.