• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    But if you’ve died, then were undead, and then died again, you’d be un-undead right? So alive? It’s basic double jeopardy.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      You put the double ‘un’ but forgot the double ‘dead’.

      Oh, I didn’t realise you were actually catching the thing mid statement.


      Still:

      • A dead un-dead would be a re-dead, not very alive
      • Considering the 2x dead person is still capable of commenting, I would assume it came back after re-death and is now in some other condition.
        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The thing is that ‘un’ is different from stuff like ‘not’, ‘non’ and the likes, because it is not just denying the referred word but saying that the effect of the referred word was reverted somehow.

            • ulterno@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Your silly joke was on Programmer Humour. You might find geeks and nerds here.

              Overthinking is our ikigai.


              Now get out of line and continue with further analysis of the ‘un’