• Aeao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s solid advice to listen to what they say, because they are actually confessing what they want to do.

    “If we defind the police people will go around killing everyone they want”

    … Uh … How many people do you WANT to kill? Because my number is 0…

    And of course this is another clear example.

    “They are trying to creep on young girls”

    Uh… Why do you’re state make it legal to touch children’s genitals if you’re proving their gender and force people to undress for you to use the bathroom???

    A more personal one:

    “They are forcing their lifestyle on us!!!”

    Uh… Is it okay with you guys if I’m asexual?

    “No! That asexual means your gay and gay people are child molesters. So stop being asexual”

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Technically my number is not 0. And the police really only protect the small percentage of people in this world that deserve the guillotine. So, in a way they’re right about that one. Just not in the way they think they are.

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I understand the guillotine comments. Let me you ask you this if I was magic and offered you a choice

        You could execute these people and it would be legal

        Or you could change the things they did.

        Which would you prefer?

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Depends on what you mean by “change things they did”.

          If that was the case they wouldn’t be those people anymore.

          Capitalism isnt failing because of some moral failure of the wealthy. It’s failing because of its contradictions.

          The guillotine is simply a symbol of revolution. Revolution does not require violence if the ruling class gives up it’s power. But, historically, they never have. And the Capitalist class will not either. So violence is necessary in response to the state structures of violence.

          So, I guess my point is that I’m not saying I want to kill capitalist. But, historically, the ruling class does not want to give up their class position and so violence is required to destroy the structures that uphold their class position.