Building a computer soon. Broke 3 arch installs already… (Hope i posted this right)

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Go for EndeavorOS without shame if all you want is an Arch-like system, without the hassle.

    Cue the zealots screaming “Endeavor is not Arch!”

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I love your comment because I’ve been told the opposite. That Manjaro is Arch but Endeavour is not. I’ve also been told that neither is Arch. And I’ve been told that both are Arch.

        The thing is, I don’t care.

          • Ooops@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because that’s the bullshit Manjaro promotes by giving pre-installed access to the arch user repository and pretending that they are just delaying arch updates by two weeks for additional stability checks.

            That the whole concept of additional two weeks is bullshit if you don’t do work in that time frame and just delay everything (even critical fixes) and AUR+outdated Arch is your ticket straight to dependency hell is what makes makes Manjaro bad.

            That they then also managed to DDOS the AUR for everyone adds to their likability from the Arch perspective.

            So in the end Manjaro is damaged Arch and Endeavour is an Arch-derivate. Which one is closer to Arch (technically it’s Manjaro) is irrelevant, because one isn’t even a properly working distribution.

        • MrBubbles96@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Manjaro is Arch and Endeavour is not

          So if Manjaro is Arch, I should be able to get daily updates and use the AUR without a problem, right?

          right?