• FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    Only other successful authors can criticise successful authors behaviour now? fuck that.

    The fact she wrote a masterpiece has no bearing on the fact she is a total bigot in social media.

      • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        if you look down on anonymous discussion, and see it as cheap and cowardly, what the fuck are you even doing here on lemmy in the first place?!

        • rainrain@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I look down on anonymous criticism of great artists. I look down on membership in the outrage mob. I look down on that damnable mediocrity and pettiness.

          Perhaps you misread.

          • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            Lemmy is not an anonymous community, it’s pseudonymous. It also doesn’t take a literary genius, merely someone with a healthy amount of empathy, to understand that treating someone with hatred for an immutable characteristic is bigoted and wrong. I don’t believe that to be an outrageous opinion.

            Perhaps it is you that is mediocre and petty.

      • starlinguk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh do shut up. I’m a big Harry Potter fan (or at least used to be), and part of a well known group of fans, but at least we all have the decency to be thoroughly pissed off by the woman. If you love Potter so much, how come you missed the message of the books (don’t be a bigot) and the current behaviour of their writer (a bigot)?

        PS Dickens was a misogynist and Dahl was a racist and anti-semite. But we can’t criticise them because they’re good authors?

        • rainrain@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Anonymous criticism is lhe least effort contribution to the conversation. Playing your part in the outrage mob takes the least intelligence, the least insight. So when you do that, when you shout in chorus with the rest of the mob like that, conforming like that, you show yourself to be very very small. Like a crawling worm.

          And when you get out there and put the best you’ve got into a piece of art that blows the minds of an entire generation, you show yourself to be very very large. Like a soaring eagle.

          And for a worm to criticise an eagle is absurd.

          • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            LMAO

            The lady who came up with the “slavery is good actually” race of people isn’t who I would call an Eagle.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            You simply love the taste of boot. Sycophants are some of the dumbest people to exist, yet you happily place yourself there…

            Have fun being that which you hate: a worm.