• MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    The getting to keep your job bit is not quite right. Often, one also has to go find their own funding. Sort of based on the publications, but not necessarily.

    • CeeBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the implication is the whole “publish or perish” mindset in academia.

      If you don’t constantly publish something then your career and work is considered stagnant. At which point you lose out to other researchers, and effectively can’t get paid for your work. Aka: you lose your job

      At least that’s how I understand it.

      • mranachi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The academic system is a tiered system. Publish or perish is a term that mostly applies to early to mid career researchers, who are pracitcally all employed on fixed term contracts.You don’t lose your job if you don’t publish, you just can’t get (or are less competitive for) your next job.

        Tenured academics (professors/A. Prof.) are on ongoing employment by the university. Their job is never really under threat. Although if they wanted to move jobs and be successful in grants then they want a productive group (many publications) to prove they are leading cutting edge research.

        Universities care directly around how much grant funding their professors can pull into the university. However, in many countries it’s difficult to remove long serving academics. It’s not uncommon for ‘retired’ proffs to die at their desk, even though they checked out decade’s ago.