• boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    You said ANY productivity. It sounds like you mean amateur productivity.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Two people have told you that AI can be useful, but not if used by people who don’t know what they’re doing. It boosts the productivity of people who know the field they’re working in, and know the strengths and weaknesses of AI.

        You ignore it and say that because some people don’t know how to use it, it’s completely useless.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I said any productivity gains are offset by loss of quality and capability, and I actually think that’s especially true in your coding example due to large measurable increase in security flaws.

          You gave a shit example and now you’re tripling down on it.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Any productivity it gives has a noticible drop in quality and capabilities that result in net loss.

            The productivity that skillful users get from it does not have a drop in quality or capabilities.

            Word it better if you want people to understand that you mean another thing entirely.

            Also love how you’re downvoting my comments just because you disagree with me, whereas I’ve yet to downvote any of your comments. Really puts it into perspective with what kind of a person I’m arguing with. Bye.