- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
With such an absolute statement, I’ll go ahead and disprove it by saying I wanna talk to that chatbot
I’m sure there are plenty of 12 year olds that, like me at that age, would spend all day talking to a chat bot.
Put the chat bot in a video game where I have to talk to the bot to solve a puzzle or learn about the game world and I’ll talk to it, too.
a chatbot trained by 12 year olds is a monster waiting to be unleashed
For everyone that isn’t reading the article (both here and on the HN discussion), it’s not saying not to build a chatbot.
It’s saying that site/brand chatbots are primarily going to be consumed by users’ AI assistants.
So you might say to ChatGPT or Siri that you need a new pair of shoes.
ChatGPT in the background talks to chatbots on a bunch of shoe sites and asks you further questions to narrow down options.
So much like search engines became the primary interface for finding value on the web a generation ago, AI assistants will be the primary filter for domain specific chatbots.
While technically in line with the headline, extrapolating from the headline without reading the article is 100% leading misinterpreted comments.