fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 天前At this rate, why not.mander.xyzimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1358arrow-down12
arrow-up1356arrow-down1imageAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 天前message-square90fedilink
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 天前Also would it kill all the sea life leading to a large amount of greenhouse gas emissions from all the decomposing fish corpses? Does undersea decomposition release greenhouse gases?
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·12 天前And doesn’t plankton already sequester CO2 on the ocean floor when it dies?
minus-squareTeamAssimilation@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 天前Oh right. The solution of course is a bigger bomb.
Also would it kill all the sea life leading to a large amount of greenhouse gas emissions from all the decomposing fish corpses? Does undersea decomposition release greenhouse gases?
And doesn’t plankton already sequester CO2 on the ocean floor when it dies?
Oh right. The solution of course is a bigger bomb.