In months where you don’t utilize any searches on your plan, we will automatically apply a full credit to your account for that month. This credit will be applied to your next billing cycle, effectively covering your subsequent month’s subscription at no additional cost.

  • sudneo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    The user growth has been bigger than usual in the last months, they have live stats. Not to say they were breaking even at around 25k users, they now have 38k.

    Also their product shouldn’t be interesting, should be invisible. It’s a search engine, not a toy.

    If you really want to see malice, I would say it’s more of a marketing move because very very few users will not make any search at all in a month. And those users have indeed no cost for them. Giving them credit still means you are getting the money eventually.

    • aaron@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Sorry, I use a search engine about 300 times a month at minimum. I’m not what you’d consider a power user right now. I agree it shouldn’t be interesting, but it should be used at least. How many figures are you earning?

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        You said “if your product is not interesting enough for users to use”.

        The product has to be useful, and the user growth for a obviously premium service I think is a good testimony of that.

        Have you considered that they might be a healthy business that doesn’t bleed money (like most tech companies) and therefore doesn’t need to rely on trapping users in subscriptions hoping they won’t use the product?

        Also what’s with the passive aggressive tone? We are talking about a search engine, chill.

        • aaron@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          18 days ago

          I’m fine. I feel like I’m arguing with a secret Kagi operative here.

          I haven’t considered that they might be a healthy business but you seem to know a lot more than I do about it…

          Please, keep sharing what you don’t know about Kagi

          • sudneo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            I am repeating data points they shared during the community event.

            BTW buddy, you can cool it with the passive-aggressiveness. Not everyone on the internet is out to get you.

            The info about them breaking even at 25k was shared in the discord channel (which I very rarely look). The rest are stats that are published on their website and as I said shared during the yearly community event.

            I work in tech, and I would be blind to not acknowledge that a company which:

            • is profitable/breaks even after few years of operation
            • does that with 25k users
            • doesn’t have a marketing budget (used to, now they might have a ridiculously small one).

            Might be a healthy business, different from 99% of tech companies that generally bleed money even with millions of users.

            You seem completely sure of the opposite, whatever, don’t use their service lol

            • devfuuu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              Kind cool to see a profitable company like that. I worked on a place that for years was burning millions of dollars every month in hopes of eventually making it work out 😄