nifty@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoTwo sides of the same shit coinlemmy.worldimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up167arrow-down184
arrow-up1-17arrow-down1imageTwo sides of the same shit coinlemmy.worldnifty@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down2·2 days agoThoughts on “On Authority” by Engels?
minus-squareLad@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·2 days agoThese people don’t read theory
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoIf you keep asking this way, they might
minus-squareComrade Spood@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoEngels was a bourgeoisie cunt that doesn’t understand what the word “authority” means.
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoCan you elaborate on how he was wrong with specific citations from the text?
minus-squareComrade Spood@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 hours agoHere’s a video full of them. I am done and fulfilled my end of this interaction. I will not fall victim to tankie sealioning. https://youtu.be/sexImJU4-Oo
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·21 hours agoCan you personally give me one example? Tell me roughly where it is in the text? Just one
minus-squareDeceptichum@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-22 days agoLow tier garbage rant about revolutionaries vs reformists. It’s the equivalent of a 19th century reddit rant complaining that people don’t want to bow down to authority until we’re magically all ready.
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoHow was it wrong? Use specific citations from the text
minus-squareDeceptichum@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoNo. Theory is for idiots, time would be better spent on praxis than sitting around circle jerking about what we would do.
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 hours agoAuthoritarianism is wrong yet you’re correct without any room for discussion?
minus-squareDeceptichum@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-223 hours agoWould you have a discussion in favour of racism or homophobia? I don’t engage JAQing off.
minus-squarepassiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 hours agoBigotry is wrong because innocent people are presumed to be evil or guilty based on a presupposition Give me the same line of reasoning against the text, just one, reference it directly
Thoughts on “On Authority” by Engels?
These people don’t read theory
If you keep asking this way, they might
Engels was a bourgeoisie cunt that doesn’t understand what the word “authority” means.
Can you elaborate on how he was wrong with specific citations from the text?
Here’s a video full of them. I am done and fulfilled my end of this interaction. I will not fall victim to tankie sealioning.
https://youtu.be/sexImJU4-Oo
Can you personally give me one example? Tell me roughly where it is in the text? Just one
Low tier garbage rant about revolutionaries vs reformists.
It’s the equivalent of a 19th century reddit rant complaining that people don’t want to bow down to authority until we’re magically all ready.
How was it wrong? Use specific citations from the text
No.
Theory is for idiots, time would be better spent on praxis than sitting around circle jerking about what we would do.
Authoritarianism is wrong yet you’re correct without any room for discussion?
Would you have a discussion in favour of racism or homophobia?
I don’t engage JAQing off.
Bigotry is wrong because innocent people are presumed to be evil or guilty based on a presupposition
Give me the same line of reasoning against the text, just one, reference it directly