• Oldmandan@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get that intellectually, it’s just something that didn’t really click, before. If a corporation is subject to the laws of all countries it operates within, (even when those laws contradict) are they really subject to any laws? Only applying law based on user origin does sidestep that for the most part (even though virtual ‘spaces’ like Facebook and other social media do make that kind of weird), but mixups like this make that tension more obvious.

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah man, as someone who works in privacy for a global company in a tech space it’s just a constant juggling act. By the time you’ve caught up to EU regulation California and Brazil are changing their regulations. Some of these don’t agree to the point where core functions that involve data movement from between countries is just straight up impossible legally. What one country allows, another country has banned lol.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re not subject to all of the laws at the same time. They’re subject to the laws that apply to each user’s country in that user’s case. If user A engages in an interaction with user B that is illegal for both parties in user B’s country but legal in user A’s country, only user B could be affected, assuming the interaction gets noticed. It’s similar to how if you shop on an online store like Amazon or Etsy, they have to charge your local taxes and not the seller’s taxes.